|
Don't bother with these books!
|
|
The following are books that individual
pagans/heathens have found to be unhelpful, full of bad information, or misrepresenting the subject matter.
Of course, it is always up to you whether or not to read any given
material, but these are suggestions.
If you want to add books to this list, please email the site owner with "PD Bad Books" in the subject line and give the information in the format shown below. |
|
Main
~ Reading List
|
|
Book:
The Dark God: Exploring the Male Shadow
by Marcia Starck Why I don't like it:
It does not give much information about any of the deities it talks about, nor does it provide any new or thought-provoking discussion.
There are other books that deal with each of the figures in this book, but which do so much more competently. Suggested alternate reading:
I really don't know of any single book that covers the male shadow aspect well.
There are other books that cover male deities, and do it well, but not as a compilation centered on dark masculine aspects.
|
|
Author:
Ralph Blum
(all works) Why I don't like his works: For the most part, his work ignores most traditional lore - he makes up his own order for the runes, and makes up a new stone ( a blank stone ) which has no basis in tradition, and makes no sense within the culture.
|
|
Book:
21 Lessons of Merlyn by Douglas Monroe Why I don't like it:
It is misogynistic in the extreme, which is not Druidical.
It ignores available texts which are truly historical and touts a patriarchal, monotheistic perspective more like that of the Knights Templar than either ancient or modern Druidry.
And it contradicts known historical information. Suggested alternate reading:
Anything on Druidry by Philip
Carr-Gomm, Louis Spence, or John and Caitlin Matthews
|
|
Book:
Faery Wicca Books 1 & 2
by Kisma Stepanich Why I don't like them: Unattributed quotations from the works of other people, and lots of sloppy research resulting in downright inaccuracies, historical, mythic, and logical. Suggested alternate reading:
Anything on the Feri (Faery) Tradition by Victor or Cora Anderson, or Francesca de
Grandis.
|
|
Book:
Red Moon: Understanding and Using the Gifts of the Menstrual Cycle
by Miranda Gray Why I don't like it: The author twists stories and traditions to meet her perspective with no regard for their original meaning, yet claiming that her misinterpretations are the original meanings.
One example of this is her feminization of the maypole, an obvious phallic symbol.
This book seems to be a feminist revisionism with little regard to fact.
She cites no sources for her far-fetched inventions, not surprisingly. Suggested alternate reading:
Honoring Menstruation by Lara Owen
|
|
Author:
E. A. Wallis Budge (all works)
Why I don't like them:
I don't recommend any books by Budge on the Egyptian line because he didn't do the work on most of his books; his students did and he took credit.
This is what I have heard from our leader the Nisut. So we don't follow any of Budge's books as Kemetic orthodoxy.
|
|
Book:
Memetic Magic: Manipulation of the Root Social Matrix and the Fabric of
Reality by Kirk Packwood Why I don't like them:
A bad presentation of other people's ideas. The tie-in to "Memetics"
is the same kind of device used by authors who write about
"Quantum" this and that (most of whom have as little
understanding of physics as Packwood does of Memetics); but at least
Quantum Mechanics is a real scientific theory with predictive power and
significant implications, whereas Memetics was an idea tossed off by
Gerald Dawkins which has never borne significant fruit. The editing is
abysmal to the point of infuriating the literate reader. The one
distinctive method explored in this book, automatic drawing, is already
associated with Austin Osman Spare. All that said, I do actually
like Packwood's graphical work, and I can see how it could be charged as
he intends. I am dismissing the book, not the author.
Suggested
alternate reading: The works of Austin Osman Spare, Peter Carroll,
and Phil Hine.
|
|
Author:
Fiona Horne (all works)
Why I don't like them:
She writes to a Wiccan audience - teenage girls in
particular. She commercializes the religion. She's a professed
atheist - don't expect to find many religious truths in her books.
In her works, Wiccan ethics are an afterthought.
|