|
All material in this section is copyrighted and appears with the permission of the copyright owner(s). |
Joy and AnnoyanceA review of the film Mists of Avalon (DVD, 2001)by
Freeman, December 18, 2004 I
dearly love this movie. The atmosphere, the scenery, the music, the cast,
and the sense of magic and romance have led me to watch it many times. I
have plenty of other DVDs and tapes I cannot say that about, and wish I
had just rented. Comparisons
to the book[i]
abound, but I read the book too long ago to be able to do a detailed one
fairly. I will just say that as movie adaptations go, it is not all that
awful. As
retellings of the Matter of Britain, the book and the movie are both
jokes. The pre-Christian Britons were polytheists; there would have been
no predominant cult of a Great Goddess, and certainly no matriarchy[ii].
In
any case, it is very likely that they were already overwhelmingly
Christian by the time of the Saxon invasions. Both book and movie
completely ignore the influence of Roman culture, which would have been
hard to miss for an observer who was privileged to be present at the time.
Arthur, if he did exist, would have been a commander of Roman-style heavy
cavalry, which could very well have been responsible for the respite that
the British tribes gained from the Saxon depredations at that time. He
also might well have been Christian, or just possibly an initiate of
Mithraism. What
finally brought Celto-Roman Britain down in the 7th century was the same
thing that doomed other tribal peoples: their inability to set aside
intertribal conflict and unite against a common enemy. In fact, the
leaders of the various British tribes would not have even thought in those
terms; to them, an enemy was an enemy, whether a neighboring kingdom of
long standing or an invading force. All
that said, it was a good thing to tell the story from the point of view of
the powerful women who helped to shape it. It is an effective counterpoise
to the usual tale of big smelly warriors on big smelly horses, and is more
true to British culture than the medieval romances were. Having the story
set in a religiously diverse milieu is also a worthwhile corrective, even
considering that most of the details are wrong, since the Church did not
fully control religious life in England[iii]
for another two centuries or so[iv].
[i] Zimmer, Marion Bradley. The Mists of Avalon. New York, NY: Del Rey, 1982. [ii] Eller, Cynthia. The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory: Why an Invented Past Won't Give Women a Future. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press, 2000. [iii] I have been careful to use "Britain" as the name of the island prior to the Anglo-Saxon conquest, a distinction that the scriptwriters failed to observe on one occasion in the dialog. It always makes me wince when I see Morgause refer to it as "England" while her people are still defending it against the Angles after whom it was later named. [iv] See
the excellent histories by Ramsay MacMullen for details about the
conversion process and the relationship between Pagan and Christian in
Western Europe from 100 - 800 CE: MacMullen,
Ramsay. Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth to Eighth Centuries.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999. MacMullen, Ramsay. Christianizing the Roman Empire A.D. 100-400. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984. Other
relevant works include: Jones,
Prudence, and Nigel Pennick. A History of Pagan Europe. New York:
Barnes and Noble Books, 1999. Kirsch, Jonathan. God Against the Gods: The History of the War Between Monotheism and Polytheism. New York: Viking Compass, 2004. |